Was it only stupidity that guided the Brexit project?

new-lens 5


The president of the European Union Council, Donald Tusk, has asked for a special place in hell for those who have promoted Brexit without a plan to carry it out, without even a draft for a dignified UK exit. No doubt there will be plenty of room in hell for the promoters of Brexit, for those who criticize it and for many others. It is highly significant that in the Qur-an the Fire is mentioned as a place filled to the brim with the condemned, where no room is left for even one more:

(30) The day we will ask the Fire: “¿Are you full?” It will answer: “¿Are there still more?”
Qur-an 50 – Qaf

However, there had to be other ingredients, apart from stupidity, in the Brexit stew. Let’s shuffle through memory.

The Revolution of North-American English colonies against the metropolis was nothing but an essay, a mise-en-scène with view to history, necessary to make everyone believe that there were indeed two sides fighting there and that one gained independence from the other. Yet the reality is never what it seems. The “Project America” was from the very beginning another Judeo-Masonic attempt at establishing paradise on Earth. Its objective –to set up a power so great and overwhelming that would allow them to organise the society in a way that would suit all their desires. In reality there was no war between England and her transatlantic colonies, but connivance camouflaged under the guise of skirmishes that did not go beyond a few deaths –it is well known that the blood shed for a just cause purifies souls. France and England occupied the northern part of America, since the south, the Spanish part, represented too hostile a scenario. As for their riches, England’s in particular, the English pirates operating with the English crown’s blessing were routinely waylaying the returning Spanish ships and stealing them (the riches) from their decimated and exhausted crews. Here, more historical insight, or hindsight, is needed to perceive the plot in its entirety.

comillasOne of the waves which the Jewish emigration from Arabia was riding arrived in the present-day France, where it gave rise to the Merovingian dynasty. Let’s see the process.

Several clans of Goths, already installed in the northwestern region of Germany, in the area bound by the Weser and the Rhine rivers, will be divided into three major groups –Salians, Ripulians and Hessians– from whom a people collectively known as the Franks will emerge in the third century of the present era. All of them belong to the German-speaking Rhine-Weser group. In fact, the Old German dialect they spoke was a derivation of the Goth language and, therefore, descendant of the Babylonian and the Arabic languages. One of these groups –the Salians– will move towards the Atlantic and penetrate into southern Gaul, occupying what is now Belgium and the French region of the Ardennes. With this move the Salians will transplant there their kings and the governing apparatus, establishing thus a strong Frankish presence there. There were no fights or overthrows. Since their arrival, the Frankish monarchy exercised the power it had more or less firmly, and exercised it with the almost supernatural aura that always surrounded the Merovingians.

According to most historians, the true founder of the dynasty was the Salian king Clovis VI; although it is Merovech, his relative and successor, who will give it its name and legend. According to the latter he was the son of a woman and a sea creature, symbolizing in this way its divine and sacred overseas origin, joined now to non-Jewish mortals. The Merovingians themselves affirmed that they descended from the Prophet Nuh (Noah), something that the Cathars and certain Masonic lodges had also assumed as part of their doctrines. Nuh (a.s) represents the “second beginning” after the one we owe to Adam (a.s), and among his descendants was Ibrahim (a.s), from whom, and especially from his offspring, all the Prophecy will emanate. Therefore, to arrogate oneself such an outstanding origin is to belong to the lineage of the “chosen”. On the other hand, the Jewish have always desired and struggled to detach themselves from Musa (Moses) and from the Law that he brought from their Lord.

In history and legend that was contrived –by whom?– around the Merovingians we find a great many Jewish elements and above all clear reminiscences of Sulayman’s reign –the symbol of Israelite power and example of planetary domination. According to many traditions, King Merovech was possessed of supernatural or, at least, paranormal powers, evoking those of Daud and Sulayman. For example, it was believed that he could communicate with animals, and it was in his long hair –as in the case of the Biblical character Samson– that his virtue and power lay. On the other hand, contemporary archeological artifacts point to authentic mastery of the Merovingian craftsmen and even kings. We know that since time immemorial, the inhabitants of Arabia, Jews included, the Banu Israil, were excellent, almost perfect, craftsmen. The Merovingians were often called “witch-kings” and were believed to be able to heal by the touch of their hands. Their behaviour was different from that of pagan monarchs of their time; they seemed to be priests rather than kings. As descendants of Jews or related to them, they most likely practiced ritual ablutions, scrupulously took care of their cleanliness, slaughtered only the animals “allowed” by the Law, were given to reading, writing and other practices considered unusual by the rest of the European “nobility”. As was customary throughout the Middle East and Anatolia, on the death of a Merovingian king his kingdom was divided among all his sons.

But, perhaps, what most brings to mind their Jewish origin is the jealousy and cruelty that prevailed among the members of the Merovingian family –fratricides, parricides, conspiracies among their queens, torture and revenge were common events. In his “Ten Books of Stories” the Frankish historian Gregory of Tours recalls how rivalries between the different Jewish lobbies enabled the powerful “mayors of the palace” to take hold of the reins of the Merovingian power, until in 750 Pippin the Brief, one of the chancellors of the kingdom of Austrasia, deposed Childeric III, thus establishing the Carolingian dynasty.

However, the fall of the Merovingians will have some historical weight only in school textbooks. The kings-descendants of Nuh (a.s.) had tied almost all the loose ends and had laid strong foundations on which to sustain their project of a unified Europe, supported by a Catholic Church that gradually acquired many characteristics of the monarchical power. This kind of union was to give birth to a laic state based on magic, control of yins and shayatins, and on “that” descended from heaven –much in line with what was said by them of Sulayman’s (a.s.) kingdom. It is highly interesting how this issue is treated in the Qur-an:

(101) And each time there came to them a Messenger from Allah, confirming what was with them, a group of those that received the Kitab (Book), the Kitab of Allah, would throw it behind their backs, as if something they knew nothing of. (102) They followed what the shayatin recited over Sulayman´s kingdom , but it was not Sulayman who disbelieved, but it was the shayatin who disbelieved, teaching men magic and such things that came down at Bab-il (Babylon)  to the malaikah (angels) Harut and Marut. But they would not teach anyone without warning beforehand: “We are only a trial, so do not disbelieve.”
Qur-an 2 – al Baqarah

The step previous to the unification mentioned above and a decisive factor in recovering power at an uncertain but not very distant future will be the conversion of Clovis to Christianity –a curious denomination, especially if we consider that the “Christian Church” has never existed. He could have converted to Catholicism, or to the Church of Rome, or to the Latin Church, or to any of the many “sects” whose power, in some cases, was greater than that of the Vatican. However, the term “Christianity” had its great advantages, since the Roman Church of that time had nothing to do with what we know today; not only at the level of power, but also as far as the creed is concerned; it did not constitute a compact unit based on clear prolegomena. During 4th and 5th centuries the Donatists and Aryans, among others, dominated eastern Roman Empire and much of the western Empire, and until the end of 6th century Aryanism was the official doctrine of the Visigoths in Spain. Even when Hermenegild converted to Catholicism under the “influence” of his wife Ingund –the daughter of Brunhild and of king Sigebert I the Merovingian– practically all Spanish bishops remained Aryan.

Clovis embraced “orthodox Christianity” –read Catholicism– with the same purpose as Emperor Constantine previously did –unification of the empire. Why, then, did they not join any other church or denomination, for example the Aryans, whose doctrine was more coherent, comprehensive, and more firmly rooted in much of the Roman Empire? In fact, Constantine never managed to accept the Catholic doctrine (and it is to be supposed that neither did Clovis) which is why two years before his death he was baptized by Eusebius of Nicomedia, an Aryan bishop. Clearly, the political factor played a more decisive role here than the spiritual one. The Church of Rome offered the Merovingian monarchs two advantages over any other Christian congregation. On the one hand, it maintained a clear and irreconcilable demarcation with respect to “Judaism” –something Paul of Tarsus had fought so hard for. On the other hand, the Catholic Church was, and always has been, willing to negotiate any aspect of its creed in order to preserve its power and privileges. Thus, the Merovingian and the Catholic Church shared the same interests.

If we imagine a Europe without political borders or provincial boundaries, we will see more clearly how the Merovingian oil stain extended from the Champagne region over the whole of the continent, reaching Catalonia to the south, and the British islands and Scandinavia to the north. Even the origin of the Habsburgs must be sought in the French-Merovingian stain, and the motto of the royal shield of Great Britain is still in French:

brexit 2

Dieu et mon droit – God and my right

In 1066 William the Conqueror and his Normans turn into the rulers of England. Most of the government posts will be occupied by Normans from France who spoke French only. This peculiar fact will cause French to become the language of the royal court and all courts of justice on the Island. One might think that this would be a purely transitory and easily solvable issue. However, it was not. Richard the Lion Heart, prototype of an English king, whose monument we find at the entrance to the Parliament in Westminster, did not speak English language at all, even though he ruled between 1189 and 1199, more than a 100 years after the Norman conquest.

But perhaps the most surprising symptom of the longevity of French as lingua franca (Frankish language, there you are) in England is that of its use in courts. Although all judges and lawyers, including descendants of Norman conquerors, had already been born in England, and although practically none of the ordinary citizens of Saxon origin spoke French, this language continued to be used in English courts until 1362, almost three hundred years after William the Conqueror. This apparently surprising case will not seem so if we consider that for the true elites of England, French was their mother tongue, the language of Judeo-Merovingian power.

If we now pass over the never-ending, frequent and ruthless family feuds among the Jewish, we arrive at the end of the Second World War and a bleak European scenario. However, the Jewish-Masonic, Franco-English, coalition had deposited a vigorous seed in the northeast corner of America. That seed kept growing until it became a robust scion called now “The United States of America”, represented by the Statue of Liberty –a gift from the French. This European tuber had managed to find a way to enter the Second World War (which seemingly had nothing to do with it) and ending up victorious, along with its allies, its ancestors, the Merovingian dynasty, now converted into France and England (with Scandinavia as their secret backyard). The U.S., however, needed its allies to be rich, strong and technologically superior to the rest of the world, since together with them, the United States would form the only true and relevant international community –thus the Marshall Plan is established and bags of money start to arrive in the devastated Europe. Unsurprisingly, that force, and especially that money, awoke certain spirit of independence that would evolve into the concept of “Europe” and thus the possibility of building up a new block, European, strong and independent of North America was seriously considered. The fall of the Berlin Wall seemed to confirm such an assumption since it enabled all the east European countries to enter en masse the All-European venture. The illusion seemed to be taking on flesh –the undertaking progressed as far as the introduction of common currency, establishing pan-European police force and granting freedom of movement for the members. However, the Judeo-Masonic woodworm had not stopped gnawing at the enterprise that could, some day, unbalance the Merovingian power equation. There were too many factors for the equation to be balanced –sooner or later Germany would shake off North American yoke and reclaim its right to be an independent country with no historical debts to pay, and so would Japan. Germany would never become part of the Winston triangle (Paris-London-New York). On the other hand, in the new world order that was being forged it would never have enough capacity to start another military adventure in Europe or America. Germany, then, together with its geographic allies (Poland, Hungary, Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania, mainly) would constitute a geo-economic unit without the least political or military relevance. In this way, the Winston triangle, with Australia and New Zealand right behind it, would absorb international politics and lay foundations of new world orders that would at all times be supportive of the triangle’s interests. China and Russia, especially without Putin and Xi, would fall into the Winston Club nets again, accepting, with an occasional grimace of displeasure, the club’s meddling in other people’s affairs, including their own. The river thus would return to its bed and all countries that opposed world orders forged by the Club would end up as axis of evil.

However, France yet once again felt the Napoleonic tingling of European domination and, from there that of the whole world. Trump presented Macron with a state visit and Theresa May prepared an intimate dinner in the south of France for the two Franco-British presidential couples that didn’t seem to transpire any political significance, but it did. In both cases, it was a question of correcting the dangerous trajectory that the French foreign policy was following, with such follies on the table as a European army or creation of the Franco-German axis (“the only one that save the world from chaos”). Was it possible that the French president, a Jew, failed to understand the Club’s winks? The outcome –the yellow vests are doing their job right now, as we are writing.

comillasMacron is confused and moves in a delirious schizophrenia…

brexit 3

Macron is confused and moves in a delirious schizophrenia which everybody takes advantage of –Germany joins France in an effort to separate themselves from the United States, and the UK woos France in order to lead her away from Brussels and bring her back to the Winston club. Macron is confused, perhaps because he does not know history, his own history. His confusion, his schizophrenia, leads him to join the United States and the UK in their attack on Syria perpetrated last year by the Winston triumvirate, the same triumvirate that has closed ranks against Maduro in the case of Venezuela. How is it possible that someone who talks about creating a European army and axis joins two other members of the Winston club in events that, precisely, should have demonstrated his independence from the Anglo-Saxon politics? He joins North America, which is not a European country, and the UK which is exiting Europe. Where, then, is France’s European policy? Who, really, are Macron’s allies? The answer lies in his Winston schizophrenia –on the one hand, he knows that the project “Europe” is a fiasco, and on the other hand he wants to become independent from the United States. The Trump and May’s wink was clear –“we are an irreducible, historical and historic private club, based on the rebellion against prophecy. I leave Europe –Brexit– and you must do the same –Frexit”. If he does not do it, if he does not understand the blink, there will be a change in the Élysée Palace.

French/Macronian schizophrenia contrasts with Italian mental health. Italy does have a European policy independent, as far as possible, from the United States, which clearly indicated that no missile would ever leave the Italian ground in direction of Syria.  Furthermore, the Italian government maintains good relations with Russia. Just recently Italy has vetoed the proposition that the European Union as such accepts the self-proclaimed new president of Venezuela.

If there is Brexit and there is a change in the Élysée, a possible scenario in the medium-long term would include the reshuffle at the Winston club (Brexit-Frexit) and a Europe swimming with two currents –the German one and the Italian one. Unfortunately Spain will remain a somnolent summer resort.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s